I agreeto Idea Specify full support the use of OSS COTS, rather than just COTS

25 votes

I disagreeto Idea Specify full support the use of OSS COTS, rather than just COTS

Rank6

Idea#9

This idea is active.
Common Data, Services and Applications »

Specify full support the use of OSS COTS, rather than just COTS

From the plan:

"Effective commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) systems and contractual business support operations are acquired more efficiently and can replace legacy geospatial applications."

The geospatial community would like to see the Federal Government revise this statement to specifically include open source software (OSS COTS) products for geospatial - and would also like to see the statement of direction be modified to specify that OSS COTS will be given fully equal preference with proprietary commercial software (COTS).

The DoD clearly supports the use of OSS COTS with the policy direction they released 1 year ago. The Geospatial Platform should follow that direction. There is a growing collection of excellent OSS COTS packages for geospatial that are highly performant, use open and industry standard protocols, and are considerably less costly than paying for proprietary software licenses on a national scale. The nation's geospatial data is a critical resource and storing it in proprietary software systems and formats is directly opposed to the concept of open government.

http://cio-nii.defense.gov/docs/OpenSourceInDoD.pdf

http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/oss/Open_Source_Software_%28OSS%29_FAQ.htm#Q:_How_do_GOTS.2C_Proprietary_COTS.2C_and_OSS_COTS_compare.3F

Comment

Submitted by Samuel James 2 years ago

Vote Activity Show

(latest 20 votes)

Comments (5)

  1. Yes to open source geospatial software. There are many FOSS packages and technologies available and evolving to run the Geospaial Platform. Its the President's directive, so let's do it. Thanks. Drew Pilant, Ph.D.

    2 years ago
  2. I totally agree with Drew's comment. I'd actually amplify this entire argument. Considering all the benefits of FOSS (from software quality, to cost, to development process and incentives, adaptive/agile qualities for both OS/infrastructure and specialized geospatial software), the architects and policy makers of the GeoPlatform need to clearly articulate technology selection/acceptance criteria that can result in decisions against using FOSS.

    The recommendations for the Dutch SDI captures that argument very well:

    http://www.geonovum.nl/sites/default/files/algemeen/MOT20100618TechnicalDesignv1.0.pdf

    See Section 2 and on:

    "The Dutch government has adopted a policy on open standards and open source, known as the 'Heemskerk

    action plan'. As part of this policy, Dutch public administrations need to provide explanations if they do not

    use open standards and if they decide against using open source software when making procurement

    decisions."

    The two bullets that follow capture the key points of the arguments.

    -Ilya Rosenfeld

    2 years ago
  3. A definite +1

    2 years ago
  4. Yes, open source software should be equally considered in implementation of the GP. We are developing a geospatial clearinghouse utilizing OSS as core components: data discovery (GeoNetworks), data delivery (GeoServer), data storage (PostGIS).

    http://ogi.state.ok.us/ogi/default.aspx

    2 years ago
  5. I agree, Open source gives us the greatest flexibility with setting standards for the future and making the interoperability between products much palatable to the user community. Competition and the free market go hand in hand with creating an environment that not only bolsters the economy but also the creativity of the individual. An entrepreneurial dreamscape of what might be. Just my thoughts, Rick Pryce, PSM

    2 years ago